Skip to main content

True Freedom or Just Escape

I recently met a young man who told me he felt no need to marry or even be in a relationship. “Loving myself and living only for myself gives me the greatest satisfaction,” he said with confidence. “I am financially independent and capable of taking care of myself. No bondage, no attachments. I am the king of my life and can live entirely on my own terms. That is true freedom, and I enjoy it.” From the way he spoke, it seemed he expected me to admire his choice and perhaps even praise his lifestyle.

His words made me pause. Many men and women today feel the same way. Some of this comes from observing broken relationships, stress within families, and the struggle of commitments. Their search for independence is genuine, but is their idea of freedom complete?

I did not wish to be judgmental. Instead, I gently told him, “I am nobody to judge you. But if this freedom gives you peace, contentment, bliss without anxiety, and a deep sense of fulfillment without any inner void, then it is indeed something to be appreciated.”

He was silent for a while and then admitted honestly, “Not really. I am not free of those feelings. But compared to what I see around me, I am happy.”

That response set me thinking too. Perhaps many today are not fully aware of the framework of Purusharthas, the four guiding principles of life: Dharma, Artha, Kama, and Moksha. Dharma is living by values and virtues, righteous living. Artha is about being financially stable. Kama refers to fulfilling desires in a responsible way. And all of these should ultimately lead towards Moksha, liberation.

Liberation is not about doing whatever one pleases. It is a gradual inner process of freeing the mind from attachments, greed, anger, fear, and insecurities. In ancient thought, moksha was described as freedom from the cycle of birth and death. In our modern context, it can also mean freedom from the inner afflictions (kleshas) spoken of in the scriptures—ignorance (avidya), egoism (asmita), attachment (raga), aversion (dvesha), and fear (abhinivesha).

As the Bhagavad Gita reminds us (4.20):

“Tyaktvā karma-phalāsaṅgaṁ nitya-trupto nirāśrayaḥ, karmaṇy abhipravṛtto ’pi naiva kiñcit karoti saḥ.”

Let go of attachment to results, remain content and independent, and even while acting fully, be inwardly free.

A life centered only on oneself, constantly asking “what’s in it for me,” can never bring lasting contentment. Seva, or selfless service, is the true key to happiness. When we begin to see no separation between ourselves and others, when we live with love, compassion, kindness, and devotion to something higher, we naturally feel fulfilled. In relationships too, the balance lies in attachment with detachment, caring deeply without clinging.

After all, human beings are social and emotional by nature. The desire to love and to be loved is both biological and psychological. That is why it's difficult to believe that one can be truly happy while saying, “I need no relationship, no love,” unless one has consciously left behind the life of a householder and chosen the path of renunciation.

In the end, freedom is not a life lived apart, but a heart that embraces without fear, serves without expectation, and rests in the joy of the higher Self. That alone is the liberation every soul seeks.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Radha and Rukmini: Two Facets of Love in Krishna’s Divine Lila

In Krishna’s divine lila, love reveals itself in many shades, not to confuse us but to awaken us. At first glance, Krishna's bond with Radha may seem puzzling, especially since Rukmini was his lawful consort. Yet across centuries, temples, songs, and hearts remember Krishna not as “Rukmini-Krishna” but as “Radha-Krishna.” Is this a contradiction or a deeper spiritual insight? Radha and Rukmini are not two separate loves but two expressions of the same divine force. They symbolize two dimensions of love — the worldly and the transcendental, the composed and the consuming. They are not in conflict but in complement, reflecting the soul’s journey towards the Divine. Rukmini, the queen of Dwaraka, embodies Maryada, the love that lives within the boundaries of dharma. She is Lakshmi incarnate, graceful and steadfast. Her love stands for sacred partnership rooted in harmony, order, and purpose. She represents apara shakti, Krishna’s manifest energy that sustains worldly life. Radha, the...

The Inverted Tree: A Symbol of Inner Growth and Awakening

Humans are born to evolve and transform. Growth, success, and happiness are universal aspirations. But how can one truly evolve while pursuing these goals? The answer lies in an ancient, striking image: an upside down tree with roots reaching towards the heavens and branches extending downward towards the earth. This profound symbol, found in sacred texts, invites us to rethink life’s purpose and redefine growth and truth. Unlike ordinary trees rooted in soil, this tree draws nourishment from the divine. It reminds us that true stability comes not from external achievements but from inner alignment. The roots symbolize our spiritual foundation — our connection to a higher dimension of being. Roots provide stability and a solid base, inviting us to strengthen them by drawing strength from infinity. The outer world consisting of branches, leaves, and fruits is a manifestation of Maya in samsara, a fleeting illusion. Life balances not by chasing fruits but by anchoring in the source that ...

A Contemplation on the Divine Mystery

Is There a God? This question has stirred the human mind since the dawn of consciousness. We look to the skies, to silence, to scripture, and to the stirrings within, seeking something greater than ourselves, something we often call divine energy. Yet no one has seen God in a definitive way. God does not lend Himself or Herself to direct perception. Still, across time, mystics, sages, and seers have spoken of glimpses: an inner light, an all-pervading presence, a stillness beyond the senses. For some, God is a personal being who is loving, guiding, and responsive to prayer. For others, God is an abstract principle or simply a hypothesis. This leads to a perceived divide between believers and non-believers. But perhaps this divide is not absolute. The question of God’s existence may not be one of right or wrong in nature, but of faith and perception . The Upanishads describe the divine with quiet precision: "Yato vācho nivartante aprāpya manasā saha" "Words turn back...